A proposal to further limit nuisance lawsuits against large agricultural operations was criticized over and over Tuesday as nullifying all such lawsuits and as a “solution in search of a problem.”
“There is not a nuisance lawsuit problem in Nebraska,” said Lincoln attorney Jonathan Urbom.
He and others testified that Legislative Bill 662, a tightening up of the state’s Right to Farm Act, would “immunize” agricultural operations from virtually all nuisance lawsuits.
Testifiers told members of the Legislature’s Agriculture Committee that they were aware of no nuisance lawsuits being filed against farming operations since the last time the Right to Farm Act was amended in 2019.
“LB 662 does not protect family farmers, it protects industrial entities like Costco,” said Susanne Haas, a lawyer and farmer from Washington County, who testified with a baby in her lap.
The bill was introduced by State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln, in conjunction with Lincoln Premium Poultry, which operates the plant in Fremont that processes chickens that Costco raises, through contracts, at dozens of farms across eastern Nebraska and western Iowa.
Ballard described his bill as a “preventative measure” that would prevent nuisance lawsuits from out-of-state entities that have plagued large livestock confinement operations in other states, citing North Carolina, Kansas and Iowa.
“Agriculture is our number one economic driver and we need to protect it,” Ballard said.
National headlines were generated in 2018 after a federal judge awarded $50 million to 10 residents living near a huge hog farms run by a subsidiary of Smithfield Farms. The residents had sued, claiming that stench and flies from the hog sites were an unbearable nuisance.
In response, North Carolina passed a “Right to Farm” bill in 2018 that is nearly identical to the proposal in Nebraska.
LB 662 would limit nuisance lawsuits by:
- Requiring that only those living within a half a mile of a farm can file such a lawsuit.
- Limit lawsuits to only the “majority” owner of nearby properties, thus eliminating renters or minority owners.
- Reducing the statute of limitations from filing a nuisance suit from two years to one.
- Disqualifying lawsuits if an operation was in “material compliance” with existing laws and was operating in a manner “consistent with commonly accepted” practices (which critics said was vague).
- Blocking lawsuits in the event of a change in ownership, increase in size or change in farming operations.
That last clause, according to Nebraska College of Law Professor Anthony Shutz, would bar a lawsuit if a farmer switched from growing corn and beans to raising “10 thousand head of fat hogs next to you with a lagoon.”
Goes too far
“That goes a little far,” Schutz said.
Nebraska’s Right to Farm Act was initially passed to protect existing farming operations from lawsuits filed by “city slickers” who moved in next door to discover that farming generates dust and odors.
But some rural landowners testified Tuesday that it was industrial farms that were encroaching on their homes in rural areas and that the bill violated their constitutional right to defend their fresh air and clean water.
“This isn’t just anti-Nebraskan, it’s anti-American,” said Nancy Meyer of rural Saunders County, who complained of an “eye-burning stench” from a nearby chicken farm and the need to install a reverse-osmosis system to remove nitrates from their well water.
Al Davis of the Sierra Club of Nebraska said that offensive odors can travel three to seven miles away. Other opponents of LB 662 said it can take years for a nuisance to develop, such as contamination of drinking water.
Testifying in support of the bill was Jessica Kolterman of Lincoln Premium Poultry, which processes chickens in Fremont for Costco.
She said that a review of Nebraska’s current Right to Farm Act showed it doesn’t adequately protect ag producers from nuisance lawsuits, so LB 662 is needed.
Ag under attack
Kolterman said agriculture is under attack from various forces, including those who want to ban meat to those who don’t understand agriculture.
She said the farmers who contract to grow chickens for Costco must follow standards that ensure environmental stewardship and animal welfare. They can lose their contracts if they don’t comply, she said.
But John Hansen of the Nebraska Farmers Union, who opposed LB 662, said the chicken firm had broken its promise to hire only family farmers to grow their broilers.
According to a 2019 report by the website Food & Power, at least 132 of 520 chicken barns expected to be built in Nebraska to supply Costco are owned by one North Carolina private equity firm, led by Jody Murphey.
The state’s largest ag organization, the Nebraska Farm Bureau, was neutral on the bill.
Link to the full story here: https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2023/02/14/stricter-right-to-farm-proposal-called-a-solution-searching-for-a-problem/